Council Move to Clear Coastal Bushland Sparks Debate in Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs

A decision by a Sydney coastal council to remove sections of native bushland has ignited debate among residents, environmental groups and property owners, highlighting the ongoing tension between environmental protection and lifestyle amenity in premium suburbs.

The approved works involve selective clearing within several coastal reserve areas that have become heavily overgrown over time. The council maintains that much of the vegetation now consists of invasive species and unmanaged growth, which it says has reduced public accessibility, safety and overall enjoyment of the reserves.

According to council representatives, the intention is not wholesale clearing, but targeted vegetation management aimed at restoring sightlines, improving access to walking paths and enhancing the usability of public open space. The works are expected to commence later this year.

Environmental advocates, however, have raised concerns about the precedent such a move may set. They argue that coastal bushland plays a critical role in biodiversity, erosion control and temperature regulation, particularly in dense urban environments. Critics also point out that most local councils are currently pursuing policies to increase tree canopy rather than reduce it.

The issue has also reignited broader conversations around property values and views. In tightly held coastal suburbs, ocean outlooks can significantly influence buyer demand and pricing, making vegetation management an emotionally charged and politically sensitive topic.

Historically, disputes over trees and views have often involved private landowners taking matters into their own hands — sometimes illegally — leading to fines and community backlash. In this case, the controversy stems from a council-endorsed approach, which some see as prioritising visual amenity over long-term environmental outcomes.

Community feedback has been mixed. Some residents welcome the works, citing improved safety, accessibility and enjoyment of public land. Others fear the loss of natural character and warn that once vegetation is removed, it can be difficult to restore.